I have always known about the progression of social media/technology since you can physically see it…e.g. the effectiveness of the cell phone or records to CDs. It’s visible. However, you don’t necessarily think about the progression in literature or TV shows as frequent. This article, “The Ecstasy of Influence” by Jonathan Lethem was very interesting to read because it highlights eerie similarities and possible “plagiarism” of all previous/present works of ‘art.’
“The Ecstasy of Influence” discusses the progression of music, literature, and modern TV shows of today, which are nothing more than a reproduction of a past storylines (with a bit more creativity and updated affects).“Was the photographer stealing from the person or building whose photograph he shot, pirating something of private and certifiable value?” Lethem poses the argument that there are similarities between the Brothers Grimm fairytale stories, Shakespeare, and Walt Disney’s overall vision; however there are minor exceptions. Personally, I wouldn’t associate fairytale stories with Shakespeare but rather recognize them as “Disney characters.” It was Disney that took those stories and reinvented the personalities. To reiterate Lethem’s point, “If these are examples of plagiarism, then we want more plagiarism.” In a lighter tone, Disney took the photo that was already shot and built on it having his own spin on it.
Although plagiarism is not tolerated in social media or really any aspect of creative art…you can't reject it all that much since most creations had to happen from somewhere in order for a re-creation to happen. Overall, Lethem proves that although these works literature or film were published and printed before, if it was not for someone else’s stealing and manipulation of their creation, we would have a progression of the arts. Is it really fair to label this progression as plagiarism?
I agree with you Bridget, I think it is not fair to label this progression as plagiarism. People talk and learn from each other. People generally don't take and use the bad ideas do they? They learn from mistakes so when someone does something that works, people utilize it.
ReplyDeleteIn agreeing with Lethem's article, I would like to point out that people like the familiar. People will make this similar connections on their own, even if it was not intended to be a "copy." I said in my blog post the cliche "imitation is the best form of flattery" is something that applies to this thinking. Plagiarizing in this context is something overlooked, so there is a social stigma about this sort of plagiarizing. Something to think about.
Test comment.
ReplyDelete